[생활] "건강기능식품 광고 심의는 사전검열"
함용남
생활,문화
기사등록일 :
2020.04.05 16:53
건강기능식품 기능성광고 사전심의는 사실상 행정권에 의해 행해진다. 이는 헌법이 금지하는 '사전검열'에 해당한다. 헌법재판소는 "현행 헌법상 사전검열은 표현의 자유 보호대상이면 예외 없이 금지된다"고 판단했다. 헌재는 “민간심의기구가 심의를 담당하는 경우에도 행정권이 개입해 자율성이 보장되지 않으면 사전검열이다”고 보았다. 즉 “행정기관의 자의로 개입할 가능성이 열려 있다면 개입 가능성의 존재 자체로 헌법이 금지하는 사전검열이라고 봐야 한다"고 밝혔다.
Pre-deliberation of functional advertisements for health functional foods is actually conducted by the administrative authority. This is a 'pre-censorship' prohibited by the Constitution. The Constitutional Court judged that, under the current Constitution, pre-censorship is prohibited without exception if it is a subject of freedom of expression. He said, "Even if the civil deliberation body is in charge of deliberation, it is a pre-censorship if the autonomy is not guaranteed due to the intervention of the administrative authority." In other words, "if the possibility of intervention by the administrative agency is open, it should be regarded as a pre-censorship prohibited by the Constitution as the possibility of intervention." [정리 = 함용남 생활법률 크리에이터]
Pre-deliberation of functional advertisements for health functional foods is actually conducted by the administrative authority. This is a 'pre-censorship' prohibited by the Constitution. The Constitutional Court judged that, under the current Constitution, pre-censorship is prohibited without exception if it is a subject of freedom of expression. He said, "Even if the civil deliberation body is in charge of deliberation, it is a pre-censorship if the autonomy is not guaranteed due to the intervention of the administrative authority." In other words, "if the possibility of intervention by the administrative agency is open, it should be regarded as a pre-censorship prohibited by the Constitution as the possibility of intervention." [정리 = 함용남 생활법률 크리에이터]
