[의료] 지방흡입술 도중 뇌손상···법원 “병원측 책임 40%”
함용남
IT,과학
기사등록일 :
2020.04.08 21:38
병원에서 의료진이 20대 환자에게 지방흡입술을 시행했다. 도중에 환자가 사지마비와 언어장애 등 뇌손상을 일으켰다. 이 사건에 대해 법원이 "주의의무를 다하지 않았다"고 판단했다. 따라서 병원 측에 40%의 손해배상 책임이 있다고 판결했다. 법원은 의료진들에게 “환자 A의 예상 일실수입과 기왕치료비, 향후치료비 등을 배상하라”고 판결했다.
At the hospital, medical staff performed liposuction on a patient in his 20s. On the way, the patient developed brain damage such as limb paralysis and speech disorder. In this case, the court ruled that he "did not pay his attention." Therefore, it was found that the hospital was responsible for 40% of the damages. The court ruled to the medical staff that "compensate for patient A's expected loss of income, previous treatment expenses, and future treatment expenses."
불법행위로 사망한 피해자의 일실수입은 원칙적으로 사망 당시 피해자의 실제 소득을 기준으로 산정한다. Lost income of a victim, who died from a tortious act, shall be, in principle, estimated on the basis of the actual income of the victim at the time of death.
그러나 피해자가 임기가 정해진 직업에 종사하고 있었던 경우 피해자의 연령, 교육정도, 직업, 경력, 그 밖의 사회적·경제적 조건과 경험칙에 비추어 임기만료 후 장차 종사 가능하다고 보이는 직업과 소득을 조사·심리하여 이를 일실수입 산정의 기초로 삼아야 한다. However, in a case where the victim was engaged in an occupation with an appointed term, the occupation the victim may be deemed to be able to assume and the income that may drive from the said occupation after the termination of the victim’s office shall be examined and reviewed in the light of comprehensive consideration of the age, educational background, profession, career, other social and economic conditions and empirical rule of the victim, which shall serve as the basis for calculation of lost income.
일실수입의 산정은 공평성과 합리성이 보장되는 한 통계소득을 포함한 추정소득으로 할 수도 있다. Estimated income including statistical income may be the basis of the estimation of lost income insofar as impartiality and rationality are guaranteed.
이는 불확실한 미래 사실의 예측이므로 완전하고 정확하게 산정할 수는 없겠지만 모든 증거자료를 종합하고 경험칙을 활용하여 가능한 한 합리적이고 개연성이 있는 액수를 산출하도록 노력하여야 한다. Calculating lost income completely and accurately may prove to be impossible as the estimated income is a prediction of uncertain future facts; that said, efforts ought to be made to estimate an amount which is reasonable and probable as soon as possible by comprehensively taking into account all evidential data and making use of empirical rule.
따라서 여러 직종을 묶어 직군별로 분류한 통계소득 자료에서 피해자가 종사하는 직종을 포함하는 직군이 서로 유사하지 않은 직종으로 구성되어 있다면 그 직군의 통계소득으로 피해자의 예상소득을 산정하는 것은 합리성과 객관성을 갖추지 못한 것으로서 허용될 수 없다. Therefore, in a case where, in the statistical data on income categorized by a functional group integrating several careers, the functional group including the occupation that the victim was engaged in consists of careers that are not mutually analogous, estimating the victim’s expected income based on statistical income of the functional group lacks rationality and objectivity and thus is unacceptable. [정리 = 함용남 시사법률 크리에이터]
At the hospital, medical staff performed liposuction on a patient in his 20s. On the way, the patient developed brain damage such as limb paralysis and speech disorder. In this case, the court ruled that he "did not pay his attention." Therefore, it was found that the hospital was responsible for 40% of the damages. The court ruled to the medical staff that "compensate for patient A's expected loss of income, previous treatment expenses, and future treatment expenses."
불법행위로 사망한 피해자의 일실수입은 원칙적으로 사망 당시 피해자의 실제 소득을 기준으로 산정한다. Lost income of a victim, who died from a tortious act, shall be, in principle, estimated on the basis of the actual income of the victim at the time of death.
그러나 피해자가 임기가 정해진 직업에 종사하고 있었던 경우 피해자의 연령, 교육정도, 직업, 경력, 그 밖의 사회적·경제적 조건과 경험칙에 비추어 임기만료 후 장차 종사 가능하다고 보이는 직업과 소득을 조사·심리하여 이를 일실수입 산정의 기초로 삼아야 한다. However, in a case where the victim was engaged in an occupation with an appointed term, the occupation the victim may be deemed to be able to assume and the income that may drive from the said occupation after the termination of the victim’s office shall be examined and reviewed in the light of comprehensive consideration of the age, educational background, profession, career, other social and economic conditions and empirical rule of the victim, which shall serve as the basis for calculation of lost income.
일실수입의 산정은 공평성과 합리성이 보장되는 한 통계소득을 포함한 추정소득으로 할 수도 있다. Estimated income including statistical income may be the basis of the estimation of lost income insofar as impartiality and rationality are guaranteed.
이는 불확실한 미래 사실의 예측이므로 완전하고 정확하게 산정할 수는 없겠지만 모든 증거자료를 종합하고 경험칙을 활용하여 가능한 한 합리적이고 개연성이 있는 액수를 산출하도록 노력하여야 한다. Calculating lost income completely and accurately may prove to be impossible as the estimated income is a prediction of uncertain future facts; that said, efforts ought to be made to estimate an amount which is reasonable and probable as soon as possible by comprehensively taking into account all evidential data and making use of empirical rule.
따라서 여러 직종을 묶어 직군별로 분류한 통계소득 자료에서 피해자가 종사하는 직종을 포함하는 직군이 서로 유사하지 않은 직종으로 구성되어 있다면 그 직군의 통계소득으로 피해자의 예상소득을 산정하는 것은 합리성과 객관성을 갖추지 못한 것으로서 허용될 수 없다. Therefore, in a case where, in the statistical data on income categorized by a functional group integrating several careers, the functional group including the occupation that the victim was engaged in consists of careers that are not mutually analogous, estimating the victim’s expected income based on statistical income of the functional group lacks rationality and objectivity and thus is unacceptable. [정리 = 함용남 시사법률 크리에이터]
